Burnout Among Breast Radiologists: How Can We Restore Fulfillment?

Physician burnout is increasing in prevalence and has negative implications for the quality of patient care and the health and wellbeing of physicians. Surveys before the COVID-19 pandemic showed high rates of burnout among breast radiologists, and the COVID-19 pandemic has further increased stress. This article summarizes strategies to combat burnout, including improving individual resilience by increasing mindfulness about handling stress, making goals, and noting personal accomplishments. However, more effective change is likely to occur when there is change at both a personal and an organizational level, which includes identifying the stakeholders in a workplace and determining what changes must occur to increase joy and decrease rates of burnout. Despite the increasing rates of burnout, breast radiologists report high rates of personal career satisfaction. Self-reflection and positive steps to increase joy at work are important in maintaining career fulfillment in these challenging times.

MaThAI: A MultiModal imaging combining Mammography and Thermalytix for better prioritization of mammography scans to detect early malignancies

Background: Breast cancer screening helps in early intervention and treatment. Post COVID, there is a huge backlog of women who missed their regular screening resulting in increased workload for radiologists, delayed reporting and intervention for malignant women. Thermalytix is an AI-based tool over thermal images that generates a 5 point score called B-Score where 5 is highest suspected risk for breast cancer and 1 is the lowest risk. In this study, we propose and evaluate a multimodal imaging modality called MaThAI that combines mammography and Thermalytix for prioritization of Mammography scans using B-Score. Material(s) and Method(s): Data from two clinical studies were pooled together and a total of 583 women who took both mammography and thermal scans were included in the study. Among them, 72 women were diagnosed to be malignant using mammography, ultrasound, and/or biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity of (i) Mammography alone (as reported by experienced radiologists), (ii) Thermalytix alone (using B-Score >=3 as positive) and (iii) MaThAI (considering a scan as positive if either Mammogram interpretation or Thermalytix interpretation or both were positive) were computed. As a second experiment, we assessed the benefit of MathAI prioritized mammography scans by estimating the reporting times for detecting 95% malignant patients. Result(s): The sensitivity and specificity of mammography were 81.9% and 98.8%, respectively, assuming BIRAD 0 as negative. Assuming BIRAD 0 as positive the sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% and 86.9%, respectively. Six malignancies were found in the 67 women with inconclusive reports (BIRADS 0). When Thermalytix B-Score was considered, the sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 81.0%, respectively. MaThAI showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.6% (CI: 95.9%-100%) and 80.6% (CI: 77.2%-84.1%), respectively. The combo modality increased sensitivity over mammography alone by 16.7%, and Thermalytix alone by 4.2%, while decreasing the specificity of mammography by 6.3%. In the second experiment, we evaluated the benefit of MaThAI in prioritizing mammography scans using Thermalytix B-Score. Assuming mammography interpretation time is 20 minutes per exam and considering the order of the interpretation to be scan date + time, a single radiologist would have released the reports of 95% of the women with malignancy in 6720 minutes. Whereas using B-Score to reorder the scans for interpreting, the same radiologist would release the reports of 95% of the women with malignancy in 3080 minutes. Conclusion(s): MaThAI is a promising multimodal tool for breast screening that enables effective and efficient adjunct usage of thermal image along with mammography. It was effective in increasing the sensitivity of mammography by 16.7% and is estimated to reduce the reporting time for malignant patients by 54%. Conflict of interest: Ownership: Yes Board of Directors: Yes Corporate-sponsored Research: YesCopyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Axillary Lymphadenopathy After a COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose: Time to Resolution on Ultrasound Follow-Up and Associated Factors.

BACKGROUND. Because administration of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines is ongoing, radiologists are continuing to encounter COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy on imaging. OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to assess time to resolution of COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy identified on breast ultrasound after administration of a booster dose and to assess factors potentially associated with time to resolution. METHODS. This retrospective single-institution study included 54 patients (mean age, 57 years) with unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to the site of injection of a booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine visualized on ultrasound (whether an initial breast imaging examination or follow-up to prior screening or diagnostic breast imaging) performed between September 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, and who underwent follow-up ultrasound examinations until resolution of lymphadenopathy. Patient information was extracted from the EMR. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of time to resolution. Time to resolution was compared with that in a previously described sample of 64 patients from the study institution that was used to evaluate time to resolution of axillary lymphadenopathy after the initial vaccination series. RESULTS. Six of the 54 patients had a history of breast cancer, and two had symptoms related to axillary lymphadenopathy (axillary pain in both patients). Among the 54 initial ultrasound examinations showing lymphadenopathy, 33 were screening examinations and 21 were diagnostic examinations. Lymphadenopathy had resolved a mean of 102 ± 56 days after administration of the booster dose and 84 ± 49 days after the initial ultrasound showing lymphadenopathy. Age, vaccine booster type (Moderna vs Pfizer-BioNTech), and history of breast cancer were not significantly associated with time to resolution in univariable or multivariable analyses (all p > .05). Time to resolution after administration of a booster dose was significantly shorter than time to resolution after administration of the first dose in the initial series (mean, 129 ± 37 days) (p = .01). CONCLUSION. Axillary lymphadenopathy after administration of a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose has a mean time to resolution of 102 days, shorter than the time to resolution after the initial vaccination series. CLINICAL IMPACT. The time to resolution after administration of a booster dose supports the current recommendation for a follow-up interval of at least 12 weeks when vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is suspected.

Breast Imaging Fellowship Consortium: Developing a Comprehensive Virtual Educational Platform for Breast Imaging Fellows

Creating a comprehensive didactic curriculum for breast imaging fellows can be a demanding undertaking, especially considering that most breast practices are understaffed because of the COVID-19 pandemic and amid rising clinical volumes. This leaves little time for didactic education. In this article, we present our approach to creating a collaborative weekly multidisciplinary didactic lecture series involving multiple institutions, using the Society of Breast Imaging's suggested fellowship curriculum as the foundation. We discuss the advantages for both trainees and faculty, including fostering camaraderie, networking, and engagement among breast imaging fellows. Faculty have the opportunity for professional development by leveraging their clinical expertise through selecting didactic topics in their niche. This creates a pathway for speaking faculty to be recognized as regional and national experts.

Assessing breast cancer screening results through the lens of COVID-19 pandemic

Background: In January, 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak as the first global health emergency. Lockdowns and restrictive procedures with the full and partial cancellation of preventive measures, including breast cancer (BC) screening, took place in Kazakhstan in 2020-2021. Purpose of this study: to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC screening results. Methods: The main screening indicators before (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) were studied: planned coverage and number of examined patients, the proportion of BI-RADS categories (where BI-RADS categories 4-5 are accepted as suspicious for malignancy, additional imaging by ultrasound and/or mammography followed biopsy is recommended), the number of detected cancer cases, the stage of the disease according to the screening database and the Electronic Cancer Registry. Results: 1,624,667 women underwent BC screening in 2018-2019 (96.2% of the planned amount of 1,688,829 women). 1,532,591 (79.4%) women were examined in 2020- 2021, though the planned amount was 1,930,515. Before the epidemic, 23,296 patients received BI-RADS categories 4-5 (1.43% from examined women) and were referred for additional ultrasound and mammography examination, in 2020-2021 - 25,008 women (1.63%). 74.2% (1,205,094 women) had BI-RADS category 1 in 2018-2019 and 63.4% (971,754 patients) - during the pandemic. In 2018-2019 - 3,377 BC cases were detected (cancer detection rate was 2.0 per 1000 investigations). In 2020-2021 - 2,474 BC cases were identified (cancer detection rate 1.6 per 1000 investigations). Proportion of screen-detected cancers in stage 0-I was 45.1% in 2018-2019 and 47.5% in 2020- 2021. During the pandemic, the number of participants who underwent BC screening significantly decreased (by 20.6% of the planned). The level of cancer detection decreased too (by 22.8%). There was an increase in patients requiring further examination (BI-RADS categories 4-5) and decrease the number women with BI-RADS 1. With an increase in indications for additional ultrasound and radiological examination, the number of revealed cancers reduced by 1.5 times (in 2018-2019, 14.5% patients with BI-RADS categories 4-5 had BC confirmed, in 2020-2021 - only 9.9%). Conclusions: BC screening has been significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, attention should be paid to the increase in overdiagnosis of mammographic pathology, possibly due to an increase in the density of breast tissue on the background of nonspecific inflammation accompanied by lymphadenopathy. The impact of COVID-19 on BC is still unknown. Further research will be needed to confirm the link between COVID-19 and mammography picture and BC.

Axillary Lymphadenopathy associated with COVID-19 vaccination: updates and recommendations.

Lymphadenopathy associated with vaccination has been documented as complicating the evaluation of metastatic malignancy (Bychokovsky & Lin, 2017) (Choi, Ko, Han, J, & Kang S, 2009) (Mohseni, et al., 2014). In the past this was a limited finding, primarily documented in association with smallpox and H1N1 vaccination (Mingos, Howard, Giacalone, Kozone, & Jacene, 2016) (Fry, et al., 2021) (Panagoitidis, Exarhos, Housianakou, Bournazos, & Datseris, 2010).The advent of the novel mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 in December of 2021, and subsequent large scale vaccination effort, has resulted in a marked increase in the identification of lymphadenopathy (LAD) associated with vaccination. Because axillary lymphadenopathy is a concerning sign of metastatic disease in breast cancer, identifying the difference between benign inflammatory reaction and concerning LAD, and avoiding unnecessary additional imaging and biopsy is an essential skill. This article describes the current literature, recommendations for follow up and interventions to improve diagnostics.

TIMELY FOLLOW-UP OF ABNORMAL CANCER SCREENING TEST RESULTS IN TWO LARGE PRIMARY CARE PRACTICE NETWORKS

BACKGROUND: Timely follow-up of abnormal cancer screening test results (“abnormal screens”) is critical but often not achieved. As part of an NCI funded intervention trial (mFOCUS: multilevel Follow-up of Cancer Screening, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03979495), we report on abnormal screens that were identified and tracked to identify eligible patients overdue for study inclusion. While not anticipated when this study was conceived, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a larger than anticipated backlog of patients in need of follow-up of abnormal screens. METHODS: Patients in two primary care practice networks affiliated with Mass General Brigham who had an abnormal screen for breast, cervical or lung cancer were identified using computerized algorithms and then tracked for completion of appropriate follow-up based upon the cancer type and the severity of the abnormal result. Since the intervention was designed as a “fail safe” system, additional time (2-6 months depending on the severity of the abnormal screen) was added after the recommended follow-up interval. We report the number of abnormal screens by cancer type and severity of the abnormality and the number of patients who completed follow-up based upon guideline and expert recommendations. RESULTS: Patient tracking and enrollment started with abnormal screens for breast and lung on 8/24/2020 and cervical cancer on 10/16/2020. Enrollment ended for all abnormal screens on December 15, 2021. Over the study period, 4003 abnormal breast, 5214 abnormal cervical, and 478 abnormal lung screens were identified. High risk abnormalities were most common for cervical (51.7%, recommended colposcopy or endometrial biopsy), lung (22.6%, LRADS 4B, 4X or 5), and lowest for breast (0.4%, BIRADS 5). Rates of completing recommended follow-up of abnormal screens by cancer type and severity of the result are shown in the table. CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing the benefits of cancer screening requires the timely follow-up of abnormal screening results. Though likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified that timely completion of abnormal screens is often not achieved. Rates of completion varied by cancer type and the severity of the abnormal result but highlight the need for systems based, multi-level interventions to identify, report and track abnormal results.

Time for Resolution of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Axillary Lymphadenopathy and Associated Factors.

BACKGROUND. The variable clinical course of subclinical lymphadenopathy detected on breast imaging after COVID-19 vaccination creates management challenges and has led to evolving practice recommendations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the duration of axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination detected by breast imaging and to assess factors associated with the time until resolution. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 111 patients (mean age, 52 ± 12 years) with unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administration performed within the prior 8 weeks that was detected on breast ultrasound performed between January 1, 2021, and October 1, 2021, and who underwent follow-up ultrasound examinations at 4- to 12-week intervals until resolution of the lymphadenopathy. Patient information was extracted from medical records. Cortical thickness of the largest axillary lymph node on ultrasound was retrospectively measured and was considered enlarged when greater than 3 mm. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of time until resolution. RESULTS. The mean cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination was 4.7 ± 1.2 mm. The lymphadenopathy resolved a mean of 97 ± 44 days after the initial ultrasound examination, 127 ± 43 days after the first vaccine dose, and 2.4 ± 0.6 follow-up ultrasound examinations. A significant independent predictor of shorter time to resolution was Pfizer-BioNTech (rather than Moderna) vaccination (ß = -18.0 [95% CI, -34.3 to -1.7]; p = .03]. Significant independent predictors of longer time to resolution were receipt of the second dose after the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 19.2 [95% CI, 3.1-35.2]; p = .02) and greater cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 8.0 [95% CI, 1.5-14.5]; p = .02). Patient age, history of breast cancer, and axillary symptoms were not significantly associated with time to resolution (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. Axillary lymphadenopathy detected with breast ultrasound after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination lasts longer than reported in initial vaccine clinical trials. CLINICAL IMPACT. The prolonged time to resolution supports not delaying screening mammography because of recent COVID-19 vaccination. It also supports the professional society recommendation of a follow-up interval of at least 12 weeks when vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is suspected.

What breast radiologists have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of COVID-19 on the world of breast cancer care has been unprecedented, with worrisome short- and long-term consequences, and there remains a long road ahead to recover and unbury the breast imaging departments from their current backlog. Radiologists have to consider what the new normal will be going forward. At present time, because of widescale COVID-19 vaccination, benign vaccine-related reactive lymphadenopathy is likely to be encountered in oncologic patients and we need data-driven guidelines to manage unilateral lymphadenopathy and avoid unnecessary biopsies. In the next years, some procedures like wearing masks and maintaining social distancing will probably remain in use, as radiologists show patients that they are concerned about patient safety. Accordingly, odds are it will incorporate novel protocols for patient safety, innovative technologies (such as telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence algorithms), and changes in radiology workflow to create an environment that feels safe to both patients and radiologists, preventing backlogs (preventive service must not to be declined anymore) and burnouts (we need to take medical staff’s mental health seriously). However, there is hope on the horizon with new lessons learned from this pandemic that can help clear the backlog and improve the working in breast imaging departments to achieve what is most important: saving lives in the fight against breast cancer. © 2022 AME Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.

Incidence and time to resolution of axillary adenopathy on mammography after COVID-19 vaccination

Background: This study reports incidence, timing, characteristics, and surveillance imaging of mammographic axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. As COVID-19 immunizations continue, with possible booster vaccines upcoming, this study offers timing considerations and potential follow-up recommendations for breast imaging after vaccination. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients (pts) who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine prior to screening (SM) or diagnostic mammography (DM) at Mayo Clinic Florida between January 15 to May 31, 2021. Vaccine-related information was queried by mammography technologists. Adenopathy was assessed by interpreting radiologists and follow-up studies were collated. Mammogram adenopathy included single enlarged node, multiple enlarged nodes, and adenopathy with soft tissue stranding. Ultrasound adenopathy included mildly prominent nodes with preserved fatty hila to rounded nodes with apparent loss of a fatty hilum. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between days from vaccine and adenopathy. Results: Of 2349 pts, 34 (1.4%) had adenopathy (DM=6;SM=28) and 3 (0.1%) were symptomatic. Presence of axillary symptoms was associated with abnormal imaging (p<0.001) with an odds ratio of 33 in multivariable model. Median time after vaccine for pts with adenopathy was significantly shorter at S 14 days compared to 33 days for pts without adenopathy (p<0.001). Incidence of adenopathy decreased as days from vaccine increased (3.4% for 0-14 days, 2.1% for 15-28 days, and 0.4% for > 28 days, p<0.001). After adjusting for being symptomatic, days from vaccine still had a significant impact on finding mammographic adenopathy (for each day after vaccine, OR=0.96, p<0.001). No significant difference was seen based on age (p=0.66), vaccine brand (p=0.66), vaccine dose (p=0.18). ROC analysis to identify a cutoff value for presence/absence of adenopathy was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81) at 22.5 days following vaccination. Additional imaging with mammogram and/or ultrasound was requested for 31 pts. These included no follow-up (n=4, 12.9%), repeat ultrasound with or without mammogram in 1-3 months (n=26, 83.9%), and biopsy (n=1, 3.2%, pt with ipsilateral breast cancer with negative results, presumably vaccine induced). To date, all pts who underwent surveillance imaging demonstrated normalization of lymph node appearance. The median time for abnormal imaging related to adenopathy to return to BI-RADS 1 or 2 was 84 (range 13-157) days. Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adenopathy in this study (1.4%) appeared to be lower than self-reported axillary swelling in COVID-19 vaccine trials (16%) but is still higher than the reported incidence of adenopathy on an otherwise normal SM (0.02-0.04%). The incidence of adenopathy decreased significantly over time and was not present in most pts 28 days after the vaccine. In patients with abnormal adenopathy, followup imaging showed resolution of vaccine-induced adenopathy in most patients by 3 months.

Use of infrared thermography in medical diagnostics: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Thermography offers a non-invasive radiation-free methodology for diagnostic imaging and temperature measurement, but the extent of the current application is unclear, as is the level of evidence for each use case. Moreover, population-based thermographic reference values for diagnostic purposes are nearly unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to identify patient populations and diseases in which thermography is applied, cataloguing of technical and environmental modalities, investigation of the existence of specific reference data and finally exploration of gaps and future tasks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL, Embase, Web of Science and OpenGrey are to be searched using pretested suitable search strategies, with no language restriction, but abstracts should be available in English or German and articles should not have been published before 2000. This limited time frame is due to the rapid technological progress, which makes it necessary to exclude reports based on outdated technology. The literature found will be selected on the basis of previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, relevant data will be extracted from the included references into a predesigned table. The selection and extraction process will be conducted by two researchers independently. The report of the results will be according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The entire review process will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute approach. The scoping review protocol is registered at the Open Science Framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this work, but ethical medicine also obliges us to carefully consider diagnostic alternatives and compare them with current standards. The dissemination of the results will take place in a variety of ways. First and foremost through publication in an open access journal, but also through conference proceedings. In addition, this scoping review will serve to open up new research foci with regard to thermography.

Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Despite technological advancements focused on reducing breast cancer mortality through early detection, there have been reported disparities in the access to these imaging services with underserved patient populations (including racial minority groups and patients of low socioeconomic status) showing underutilization compared to other patient groups. These underserved populations tend to have more advanced breast cancer presentations, in part due to delays in diagnosis resulting in later stage of disease presentation. To make matters worse, the COVID-19 pandemic declared in March 2020 has resulted in significant healthcare disruptions leading to extensive delays in breast imaging services which are expected to negatively impact breast cancer mortality long-term. Given the worsening disparity in breast cancer mortality among racial/ethnic minorities and financially disadvantaged groups, it is vital to address these disparity gaps with the goal of reducing the barriers to timely breast cancer diagnosis and addressing breast cancer mortality differences among breast cancer patients. Therefore, this review aims to provide a discussion highlighting the disparities related to breast imaging access, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on these disparities, current targeted interventions implemented in breast imaging practices to reduce these disparities, and future directions on the journey to reducing disparity gaps for breast imaging patients. Tackling the root cause factors of the persistent breast cancer-related disparities is critical to meeting the needs of patients who are disadvantaged and can lead to continued improvement in the quality of individualized care for patients who have higher breast cancer morbidity and mortality risks.

Diversity and Inclusion in Breast Imaging and Radiology at Large: What Can We Do to Improve?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A racially and ethnically diverse healthcare workforce leads to increased access to care and better health outcomes. Radiology and specifically the patient-centered subspecialty of breast imaging have a growing mismatch between the demographics of the physician workforce and the patient population served. Identifying and addressing the barriers for diversity is imperative in order to decrease disparities in breast cancer morbidity and mortality and achieve excellence in patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Three major barriers to promoting diversity and inclusion in the field of breast imaging and in the specialty of radiology more generally are unconscious bias, lack of mentorship for underrepresented minority (URM) students, and career development challenges facing women in radiology. We focus on these three issues and provide suggestions for addressing each of them. SUMMARY: Tackling unconscious bias through encouraging individual accountability and establishing implicit bias programs at the institutional level, supporting both formal and informal mentorship opportunities for URMs, and creating an environment to support women in leadership will bring us one step closer to fostering a diverse and inclusive breast imaging workforce and meeting the healthcare needs of the diverse US population.

Pandemic Response to COVID-19: Lessons from Restructuring Breast Imaging at a Multi-site Academic Center in New York City.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented challenge for healthcare delivery, disrupting normal workflows and demanding re-allocation of resources. In the setting of breast imaging, this entailed an initial marked reduction of services during the acute phase of the pandemic followed by a gradual reopening with modified protocols to minimize potential virus exposure. RECENT FINDINGS: Protocols were devised for providing limited breast imaging services during the acute phase of the pandemic and for safely reopening during the post acute phase. Example cases of breast cancers diagnosed during the acute phase of the pandemic are provided to illustrate the modified workflow. SUMMARY: This manuscript reviews practical strategies for restructuring breast imaging workflow, onsite policies, and staffing at a multi-site academic center in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. By sharing our experience, we hope to provide others with a roadmap for managing breast imaging services during future unforseen crises.

Identifying Patients at Risk of Delayed Breast Imaging Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological models predict worse cancer outcomes due to COVID-19 pandemic-related delays in cancer surveillance and treatment. This study evaluated patient demographic factors associated with delayed breast imaging or procedure appointments due to COVID-19. METHODS: Patients attending a breast imaging or procedure appointment at the Pennsylvania Hospital Breast Center from December 28, 2020 to January 31, 2021 were asked to complete a voluntary and anonymous survey on the impact of COVID-19. Chi-squared and two-sample t-tests were used to analyze correlations between having a delayed appointment and various demographic variables. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy patients completed the survey. Participants were more likely to have delayed a breast imaging or procedure appointment if they were younger (53.9 versus 57.4 years old, p=0.014), had more total household residents (2.7 versus 2.2, p=0.019) or children (0.8 versus 0.4, p=0.016), personally had COVID-19 (p=0.04), or personally had to quarantine (p<0.01). Race, ethnicity, education, income level, and marital status were not found to statistically significantly correlate with having a delayed appointment. CONCLUSION: This study found that younger age, a greater number of residents and children in the household, and having a personal history of COVID-19 infection or quarantining were factors significantly correlated with delaying a breast imaging or procedure appointment. As radiology practices prepare to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on screening practices and cancer outcomes, these findings may help imaging centers refine patient outreach efforts and policy accommodations to protect the most vulnerable populations.